Report: My 2 Cents About Re-Zoning Park Slope

Hi and thanks for reading!
Get your daily dose of A Child Grows sent to your inbox free!
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter.

Joyce Szuflita, of NYC School Help is our School Expert and always has the scoop on what’s going on with schools. Joyce sent me an email after she reported from last night’s CEC meeting and also her thoughts on what it means for Park Slope.  She also breaks any school news on her blog here so make sure you check it out and sign up for her newsletter that gives you the full scoop!

From Joyce:

Report from last night’s meeting:

Close to 200 parents and neighbors crowded the PS 38 auditorium last night to hear proposed zoning changes to schools in Park Slope/District 15. Carrie Marlin, Director of Planning for the DoE, gave the presentation to present the proposed changes. The DoE is putting the presentation on their website later today for review for parents who were not able to attend.Jim Devor, CEC (Community Education Council) President, explained that these discussions began almost 2 years ago around the collaboration between District 13 and District 15 to build a new and larger building in Gowanus to house PS 133. That building will be habitable in fall of 2013 and will become a “school of choice” for both districts. When the students assigned to the new construction vacate the small St. Thomas Aquinas building at 8th St. and 4th Ave. it will be available to District 15. Over time the conversation shifted to rezoning talks for the center and south slope for District 15 as it became clear that capacity issues at PS 107 and PS 321, two strong an popular programs in Park Slope, had reached a critical point.

The drastic zoning changes to PS 321, 39, 107 and 10 that were presented to the schools this summer have been modified. The plan reduces enrollment at 321 and 107 and while it adjusts the zones of 39 and 10 – enrollment at those two schools would remain the same. The shift in the 39 zone is required to keep enrollment the same because the new school building lies within the zone. PS 10 has historically been able to take a percentage of their population from outside of zone. They will gain a larger zone and in future take fewer outside of zone families. These changes, if approved, will take effect for the 2013/14 school year. A small portion of the southwestern end of 321 and the western end of 39 are reassigned to a new school that will serve 275-335 students in the St. Thomas Aquinas building. 2 blocks near the park between 4th and 5th St. (between 7th and PPW) will be transferred from 321 to 39 to keep enrollment level at 39. 107 will be losing 5 blocks on their western and southern sides to PS 10.

These changes would only impact incoming new students or kindergarteners. All currently enrolled students, may remain in the schools were they were previously zoned for. Siblings on the affected blocks will be grandfathered in and remain in the school that they were previously zoned for. Parents whose children are currently attending prek in the schools but would be rezoned, spoke passionately about their connection to the schools and communities and requested that consideration be made for those current students. It was presented that the new school on 4th Ave. and 8th St. would begin with K and 1st graders. For the first few years that school will be adding a grade each year and have empty classrooms until they reach capacity in 2017. It was mentioned that these classrooms might be utilized as prekindergarten classrooms for the neighborhood.

One parent eloquently illustrated how 321 and 39 would lose most if not all their diversity with these changes. Parents spoke about improving enforcement of out of zone families to reduce capacity at all grades. It was explained that it is a long standing city policy that as long as you are living in the zone when you attend at kindergarten and then move out of zone, that you are able to continue attending the school. The reason for this is to protect poor and homeless families who don’t own their homes and may have to move if rents are raised. The thinking is that they should not be penalized for being priced out of a neighborhood. There was enthusiastic applause whenever the idea of turning St. Thomas Aquinas into an Early Childhood Center was mentioned. Representatives from the offices of NYS Assembly Members, Joan Millman and Jim Brennan, spoke in favor of the ECC. Passionate opponents to the rezoning plan for years, Liz Phillips, Principal of PS 321, and Brad Lander, local City Council Person, who had previously been hopeful about the ECC plan, said that they were persuaded that the ECC model would not solve the problem in the long term. They both stated that they had recently come around to understand that this current plan may be the only lasting solution to the dire capacity issues. The main issue is that St. Thomas Aquinas is too small to open up the capacity needed in the two schools. It was acknowledged that all 4 current schools in question are stellar, progressive and high performing programs. A Vice Principal from 321 has been rumored to be a candidate for the new school to be opened in the St. Thomas Aquinas building.

Some parents were present to hear news of PS 133, which was minimal. It is being talked about as a “School of Choice” for both Districts 13 and 15, meaning that parents from both districts may apply. If there are more applicants than seats, a lottery will take place. The CEC is very concerned that the D15 seats in the 133 building will be a diverse socio economic group. There are long standing and dire over-capacity issues in Sunset Park that will not be resolved by this current rezoning and they are hopeful that 133 may help to relieve some of that pressure.

Now begins the 45 day review period. The CEC is holding a planning meeting tentatively scheduled for Nov. 7 at 6:30 at 131 Livingston St. Parents are welcome but they cannot participate at this meeting. If the final plan is approved by the CEC, it will come up for a vote at the PEP meeting in January.
Here is Contact information:
Community Superintendent: 718-935-4317, Subject: District 15 zoning, email:
Community Education Council: Subject: District 15 zoning,
Office of Portfolio Management: Subject: District 15 zoning,

My 2 Cents on the Rezoning:

As you can imagine, I am getting a million calls today. I will try and answer some of your questions.

  • this plan could be tweaked, but what might be bad for some is not so bad for others, so the only case the DoE is likely to consider will be based on compelling numbers.
  • I personally feel the most interesting argument is the one about how this will effect the racial and socio economic diversity at all the schools- whatever the difference, it will likely be quite small.
  • all the existing schools are among the top performing schools anywhere around. They all have solid progressive leadership who have gathered talented staff and attracted very strong teaching. Frankly, are the kids on one block nicer than the kids on another? You know they are all awesome. The parents are all rabidly involved. The big difference will be the size of the school buildings, whether they are old or newer and the fact that PS 10 and the new school will probably be the only truly diverse programs. Will your child’s education be impacted by moving to the school on your left rather than on your right. Probably not.
  • Will your property values be affected? I leave that up to the real estate agents in the neighborhood. If it were a matter of changing the line in the north slope there would be drastic differences, but my guess is that a valuable property on 1st St., 7th St. and 10th St. are probably fairly comparable as far as the schools factor into value.
  • What about the new school? If all remains as it is now, if, as rumor says, a Vice Principal from 321 is being considered for the leadership at the school that will be housed in the St. Thomas Aquinas building. They will have a strong progressive educator from the flagship school in the neighborhood, who will likely cherry pick many of the talented teachers who may be laid off because of section reductions at 321, and the school is filled with the same school ready kids and active Park Slope parents. I am no fortune teller, but I think that the prognosis is likely pretty good.

How often can this happen? It has not happened in District 15 in my memory and when I asked the District Superintendent she said there haven’t been changes in at least 8 years (probably more). The plan is designed to manage capacity long term. I suppose that the only thing we can do is try and influence future indescriminate development.

Will this happen again? If this flies, the problem should be alieviated in Park Slope for years. But other parts of the district need to be addressed, like Sunset Park and Cobble Hill.

Is there something that you can do to influence the process? This is my first experience with rezoning, so I don’t know. I know that parent outcry last year over rezoning in lower Manhattan sent Portfolio Planning back to the drawing board. You have 45 days to weigh in. All the contact info is included in the above.

Joyce Szuflita

Joyce Szuflita, NYC School Help, is a 28 year Brooklyn resident and the mom of teenage twins who has spent years interviewing educators, touring schools, combing the internet and being generally obsessed with all aspects of public and private schooling in Brooklyn and NYC. She consults privately with families who want to navigate the school search. She can be seen in the NY Times, Time Out NY Kids, NY Family – Brooklyn, and

Similar Posts:


  1. I just took a look at “The Drivers” Facebook page and the photo collage that’s mentioned in the first comment. This does paint a different picture on the issue of diversity at 321, which is already at a low. I hope they can somehow find a way to make this change an equitable one for everybody involved.

  2. Joyce- I love your take on the issue but feel like maybe you’re going a bit soft on the socio economic diversity issue. To put it bluntly, if you if you gave someone who had never been to Park Slope a chance to walk around and then after his or her walk the chance to draw a rectangle on a map around where the less advantaged people in the neighborhood live, they would come up with the exact same rectangle that the DOE came up with for removal from their highly regarded school. To me, that’s not reflective of our community’s values which you can see from the representatives we choose to elect. Park Slopers are a community of people who believe in doing what’s right for everybody and this map is just shameful and embarrassing to those who created it. I mean, even just looking at where the line starts at first street—the block to the north is fancy, 1st is not, the block to the north is 321 and 1st is out. And for anyone who doesn’t know—321 is actually ON 1st street. To me that’s not fair, and that’s not Park Slope. I hope people make a lot of noise about this issue and actually started a facebook page to get people involved from the perspective of this: there are a lot of ways to rezone but kicking out the poorer kids to make more room for the richer kids is just wrong. My face book page is called PS 321 and 107 ReZone, I hope you check it out. I think the ‘discrimination story in images’ on the page tells it pretty well! (THE AUTHOR OF THIS COMMENT ASKED THAT I DELETE THE INFO ABOUT THE FACEBOOK PAGE AS SHE SAID THE PAGE WAS TAKEN DOWN SO AS TO NOT DIVERT TRAFFIC OR CONFUSE THE MESSAGE WITH PSP) –

  3. So far all of the discussions I have found online are focused around PS321. Is anyone out there upset about the PS107,PS 10 rezonong? I purchased a home on 15 th st specifically because i wanted my child to attend PS107 and it was so close. Anyone else share concerns over this rezonong?

  4. Hello,

    I live in 4th Ave and 5th street. I bought this apt about 1 year ago precisely because it was zoned for PS321. My daughter is 4 years old and my son is 2 years old. We made a huge financial commitment and decided to move to Park Slope in advance so my daughter could have what I believed to be the best education according to my research. I think if the schools are overcrowded, the problem should be fixed, but to give such a short notice to the residents in just chocking, disrespectful and completely unacceptable. If this rezoning really happens and takes action in 2013, and if we are suddenly rezoned and want to find another school because we simply don’t want to go to a brand new school that we don’t know if it will be a great school or a bad school, than what option do we have? Private school costs too much money for our pocket and to move is just impossible in such a short notice since january is already time to apply for school. So let’s say in 45 days from today the city accepts the proposed rezoning. It will be already december, than we have only 1 month to plan to move out to the new zone we wish to belong. That really does not sound fair to me. So I’m not even questioning the rezoning, but the extremely short notice. I invested time and money to have the right to belong to that zone. It’s just not fair that this right will be taken away from me and I won’t even have time to do anything about it….

    I would like to participate somehow in the rezoning debate and more than that, to make a complain.

    Thank you so much,
    Best Reagrds,



    If you don’t agree with the Park Slope Public School Rezoning you sign a petition!
    And spread the word, ask your friends to sign, too!

    Voice your opinion. It matters. You have the power.

  6. I would agree that the most diverse area of park slope was impacted. PS 321 is already in my opinion not a very diverse school. I would like to know people are organizing? If not, we really should.

  7. Are people organizing together in any way for a group response? As a new home buyer and mom of a 4 year old who just got rezoned out, I am devastated by this proposal.

  8. I’m really disappointed in this plan and in Liz Phillips (who is an outstanding principal). They are taking the only diverse blocks from 321. Yes, it is a small population but it makes a difference for the students. Look at the census track data. They could easily go up instead down in terms of cutting these blocks. Rezoning seems like an opportunity to address the racial and economic imbalances at these schools, not increase them further.


  1. Responses to Park Slope Public School Rezoning - A Child Grows | A Child Grows

Leave a Response